Water S.O.S Tasmania

Plantation/GMO Effect
Ban on GE Trees Gains Momentum
Press Release:
GE free NZ in Food Environment Inc. Thursday, 21 February 2008,
Ban on GE Trees Gains Momentum: Seen as Threat to Sustainability


International support for a ban on GE trees is growing, throwing further doubt on claimed benefits used to justify field-trials in New Zealand.

Over 130 organisations from around the world, including New Zealand organisations and a Member of Parliament, have sent an open letter to the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical andTechnological Advice, meeting in Rome, expressing their deep concern about genetic engineering of trees.
 
But the global concern signals the fact that GE Trees contradict calls by the Prime Minister Helen Clark to position New Zealand as sustainable, and as such pose a threat to our reputation internationally.

Already organisations like the Forest Stewardship Council specifically exclude GE timber from certification. Such certification of producers meeting basic environmental standards is increasingly important for millions of consumers using their spending power to respond to deforrestation and climate change.

"This is a wake-up call that GE trees are not only unlikely to be a magic-bullet, but are in fact a poison chalice in terms of promoting New Zealand as a source of clean and sustainably-produced products," says Jon Carapiet from GE Free NZ (in food and environment).

The concerns raised in the open letter include the fact that the genetic manipulation being undertaken is aimed at consolidating and further expanding a model of monoculture plantations that has already caused serious social and environmental impacts in many countries.

The letter provides examples of how current research would impact on the environment, given that trees are being genetically manipulated for:
faster tree growth, which would “further aggravate the proven impacts on water resources”, and mean even greater consumption of water by tree plantations.
trees with insecticide properties to make them resistant to insects, that could "result in the death of a large number of other insect species, with consequent impacts on local fauna’s food chains”.
resistance to herbicides, which “would lead to even more serious social and environmental impacts, including the destruction of local flora and impacts on human health.”
higher cellulose content that “would mean reducing the amount of lignin, the component that provides trees with structural strength, thus making them more susceptible to serious damage during wind storms.”

Trials of GE trees already underway in New Zealand were the subject of a recent report by MAF into breaches of containment and failures in compliance with biosecurity laws.

The breaches included incursions by rabbits that MAF played down as a some sort of a PR stunt.

The signatories to the open letter remind country delegates that “the last Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP-8) adopted decision VIII/19”, which “recommends Parties to take a precautionary approach when addressing the issue of genetically modified trees” and urge them to definitely ban GE trees -including fields trials – because of the serious risks they pose to the Planet’s biological diversity.

ENDS

References: The signatories and open letter:

Open letter to all members of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) - February, 2008


The undersigned, members of organizations from countries where research on the genetic modification of trees is being carried out, (or has in recent years), would like to express in this letter some of the reasons of our deep concern.

First of all, our concern is based on the fact that the genetic manipulation being undertaken is aimed at consolidating and further expanding a model of monoculture tree plantations that has already proven to result in serious social and environmental impacts in many of our countries.

In addition, the use of transgenic trees will further aggravate the proven impacts on water resources, since one of the traits that researchers are attempting to introduce is faster growth, which would mean even greater consumption of water by tree plantations.

At the same time, research is being undertaken to introduce genes that will make the trees more resistant to cold temperatures, for the purpose of planting them in colder regions and at higher altitudes in the mountains. This would lead to social and environmental impacts in areas that until now have not been affected by the impacts of current tree monocultures.

Research is also underway to develop trees with insecticide properties, in order to make them resistant to insects like the pine shoot moth (Ryacionia buoliana). This could result in the death of a large number of other insect species, with consequent impacts on local fauna’s food chains and perhaps even on the pollinization of native flora species that depend on those insects.

Research is also being undertaken to introduce genes that would increase the trees’ resistance to the herbicide glyphosate, which would lead to even more serious social and environmental impacts, including the destruction of local flora and impacts on human health.

Additionally, research is being carried out to develop eucalyptus trees with a higher cellulose content for the production of cellulose for paper and for the production of ethanol. This would mean reducing the amount of lignin, the component that provides trees with structural strength, thus making them more susceptible to suffering -as well as causing- serious damage during wind storms.

It is important to note that the last Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP-8) adopted decision VIII/19 (Forest biological diversity: implementation of the programme of work), which “recommends Parties to take a precautionary approach when addressing the issue of genetically modified trees."

This decision is founded on COP-8’s recognition of “the uncertainties related to the potential environmental and socio-economic impacts, including long-term and transboundary impacts, of genetically modified trees on global forest biological diversity, as well as on the livelihoods of indigenous and local communities, and given the absence of reliable data and of capacity in some countries to undertake risk assessments and to evaluate those potential impacts."

We therefore wish to call upon you to recommend to the Convention on Biodiversity Convention to definitely ban GE trees -including fields trials – because of the serious risks they pose on the Planet’s biological diversity.